International renowned Scientists, Doctors and specialists have been calling for action on the issue of electromagnetic radiation regulations for decades.
“Anyone who reads these cannot be left with the illusion (or delusion) that this form of energy is without adverse biological and health consequences at levels well below existing guidelines.“ Dr Magda Havas
Below a non-exhaustive listing.
1998 – Vienna Resolution
2000 – Salzburg Resolution
2000 – Stewart Report, UK
2002 – Declaration of Alcalá
2002 – Catania Resolution
2002 – Freiburger Appeal
2004 – Bamberger Appeal
2004 – International Association of Fire Fighters Resolution on Cell Towers
2004 – Maintaler Appell
2005 – Coburger Appeal
2005 – Oberammergauer Appeal
2005 – Haibacher Appeal
2005 – Pfarrkirchener Appeal and others
2005 – Saarlander Appeal
2005 – Stockacher Appeal
2005 – Freienbacher Appeal
2005 – Lichtenfelser Appeal
2005 – Haibacher Appell
2005 – Hofer Appeal
2005 – Helsinki Appeal
2005 – Lichtenfelser Appell
2005 – Stockacher Appeal
2006 – Benevento Resolution
2006 – Mobilfunk Ärzteappell Allgäu-Bodensee-Oberschwaben
2006 – Allgäuer Appeal
2008 – Venice Resolution
2008 – Berlin Appeal
2008 – French Doctor Appeal
2009 – The London Resolution
2009 – Porto Alegre Resolution
2009 – European Parliament
2009 – EMF Resolution
2010 – International Appeal of Würzburg
2010 – Copenhagen Resolution
2010 – Seletun Consensus Statement
2011 – Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection
2011 – Potenza Picena Resolution
2011 – World Health Organization
2011 – Parliamentary Assembly of Europe Resolution 1815
2012 – Vancouver School Resolution
2012 – Austrian Medical Association
2012 – Resolution on Electromagnetic Health
2013 – British Doctor Initiative
2014 – BabySafe Project: Joint Statement on Pregnancy and Wireless Radiation
2014 – Canadian Doctors Declaration to Health Canada
2014 – Scientific Declaration to Health Canada
2016 – EMF Scientist Appeal to the United Nations
2017 – Reykjavik Iceland Appeal on Wireless in School
2017 – Scientist 5G Appeal to the EU
2017 – Madrid Declaration
2017 – Nicosia Declaration
2018 – The International Society of Doctors for Environment 5G Appeal
2019 – 5G Space Appeal
2019 – Cyprus Medical Assoc (CyMA) and CNCECH to Health Affairs and Environment Cyprus Parliament
2019 – Stellungnahmen der Wiener Ärztekammer
2020 – Open Letter to Medical Professionals
2020 – Swiss, Physicians for Environmental Protection. – AefU – “In accordance with the precautionary principle, the current (EMF) limit values in Switzerland are too high. We call on politicians to apply the precautionary principle more systematically, to lower the limit values and to provide independent funding for further research.” (Translation) + AefU position statement in French – German – Italian – English
2020 – Doctors in Chile ask Health Minister for a Moratorium on 5G
2020 – Consensus Statement – UK and Int Medical – Scientific Experts – Practitioners – Health Effects – Non-Ionising Radiation (NIR) – Press release 10/11/2020 stated “…There is sufficient evidence to now classify radiofrequency radiation as a human carcinogen. Action must be taken now to reduce human exposure to non-ionising radiation to as low as can be achievable, including a moratorium on the introduction of 5G….” Anthony B. Miller, MD. Professor Emeritus, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto (UofT)
2020 – Open Letter to the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights
2020 – Canada: 5G Appeal Calling Government to Suspend 5G Rollout – Choose Safe-Reliable Fibre-Wired Connections
2021 – Scientists Appeal to President Biden
2021 – MfE Suisse – 5G De Nouvelles Règlementations pour les antennes adaptives
2022 – Electrosmog Appeal Belgium
2022 – 5G Arrêtons de jeter l’électricité par les fenêtres !
2022 – Nordic appeal: Tighten regulations on MWR – Stop further deployment of 5G
2022 – Letter to the COP 27
2023 – 7th 5G Appeal – The EU’s Illegal Precedence of Economy over Health
2023 – Environmental Organizations Issue Policy Brief on Electrosmog
2023 – Letter by expert scientists to the Italian government.
2024 – Expert Letter Opposing the Weakening of Italy’s Strict Wireless Radiation Limit
2024 – Swiss doctors organization (AefU) raises a warning finger to BAKOM (PDF in German) “We are very concerned about the use of millimetre waves for large-area communication purposes,” the association writes in the letter. The doctors’ organization AefU has been addressing the health risks of mobile phone radiation since 1998.
2024 – Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) Humanitarian Crisis: Urgent Response Needed.
2024 – International Appeal to the UN – Scientists call for Protection from Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Field Exposure [1] updated 04july2024
2024 – ICBE-EMF Urges India to Retain Strict Cell Tower Radiation Limits
2025 – Expert Scientific Commission Warns Against FCC Proposal to Deregulate Wireless Industry
2025 – Professor James C. Lin Calls for Rethinking “Flawed” Wireless Radiation Safety Standards
2025 – ICBE-EMF Submits Comments Opposing Proposal to Raise Wireless Exposure Thresholds in France
2025 – ICBE-EMF Scientists Challenge WHO-Commissioned Reviews on Wireless Radiofrequency Radiation Safety – “The safety of wireless technology is not assured.”
Source websites which offer a similar listing
- Cellular Phone Task Force
- Environmental Health Trust
- International Experts’ Perspective on the Health Effects of Electromagnetic Fields (EMF) and Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). – Dr. Magda Havas, PhD.
- 2024 Video – 5G: Friend or Foe? – One of several EMF related documentary films shines a light on an ever-expanding public health issue of significant global concern.
- Professor Olle Johansson, Scientific Advisor and Project Manager, who is featured in “5G: Friend or Foe?” along with a team of subject experts, says: “5G as well as 4G, 3G, etc., is very much about GREED and very little about human NEED. Also, it is sold to everyone as being safe although the manufacturers, operators, insurance, and reinsurance companies don’t believe that themselves.”
- Paul Heroux, PhD, Professor, McGill University Medicine, and Commissioner of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, who is also featured in the film, says, “I think that industry has created within the political sphere the impression that this radiation is inoffensive and that we don’t need to worry about it. I disagree with this entirely.”
- The BabySafe Project – Joint Statement on Pregnancy and RF Radiation
Autres Oppositions Suisse – Pétitions Open Letters – Books – What Scientific Studies ?
